Skip to content

Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
  • The Feed
Menu

“Judges strike down North Carolina voter ID law, citing its ‘discriminatory purpose’ against African Americans”

Posted on September 18, 2021September 18, 2021 by yellowdogrising

WaPo: “A panel of North Carolina judges on Friday struck down the state’s law requiring voters to present photo identification before casting ballots, saying that the measure “was enacted in part for a discriminatory purpose” against African American voters.

The ruling is the latest development in a state battle over voting rights that has drawn national attention, and it comes amid a raft of new restrictions by GOP-led state legislatures across the country, as well as an effort in Congress to restore key parts of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

The North Carolina measure, known as S.B. 824, was enacted in December 2018 after a supermajority of the state legislature overrode a veto by Gov. Roy Cooper (D). North Carolina voters also approved a ballot measure creating a constitutional requirement that voters present a photo ID. At the time, Cooper said the law would disenfranchise minority voters, who are less likely to possess the required identification.

In Friday’s majority decision, Superior Court Judges Michael O’Foghludha and Vince Rozier Jr. wrote that the attorneys defending the law failed to prove that it “would have been enacted in its present form if it did not tend to discriminate against African American voters.”

“Other, less restrictive voter ID laws would have sufficed to achieve the legitimate nonracial purposes of implementing the constitutional amendment requiring voter ID, deterring fraud, or enhancing voter confidence,” the judges wrote.

They noted that they did not find that any individual lawmaker supporting the voter-ID law “harbors any racial animus or hatred towards African American voters,” but rather that the legislature’s Republican majority targeted those voters because they were more likely to be Democrats.”

Archives

  • May 2025 (27)
  • April 2025 (58)
  • March 2025 (45)
  • February 2025 (52)
  • January 2025 (55)
  • December 2024 (33)
  • November 2024 (55)
  • October 2024 (56)
  • September 2024 (53)
  • August 2024 (46)
  • July 2024 (72)
  • June 2024 (38)
  • May 2024 (41)
  • April 2024 (49)
  • March 2024 (54)
  • February 2024 (44)
  • January 2024 (54)
  • December 2023 (41)
  • November 2023 (46)
  • October 2023 (53)
  • September 2023 (41)
  • August 2023 (50)
  • July 2023 (49)
  • June 2023 (52)
  • May 2023 (54)
  • April 2023 (59)
  • March 2023 (71)
  • February 2023 (42)
  • January 2023 (61)
  • December 2022 (48)
  • November 2022 (56)
  • October 2022 (62)
  • September 2022 (38)
  • August 2022 (51)
  • July 2022 (50)
  • June 2022 (60)
  • May 2022 (66)
  • April 2022 (67)
  • March 2022 (74)
  • February 2022 (54)
  • January 2022 (56)
  • December 2021 (59)
  • November 2021 (37)
  • October 2021 (58)
  • September 2021 (54)
  • August 2021 (54)
  • July 2021 (55)
  • June 2021 (59)
  • May 2021 (61)
  • April 2021 (61)
  • March 2021 (79)
  • February 2021 (67)
  • January 2021 (28)

Paid for by the Yellow Dog PAC and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.